On the influence of the ground track on the gravity field recovery from high-low satellite-to-satellite tracking missions

CHAMP monthly gravity field recovery using the energy balance approach revisited

authored by: Matthias Weigelt, Michael G. Sideris, Nico Sneeuw
Abstract: In this paper, the influence of the ground track coverage on the quality of a monthly gravity field solution is investigated for the scenario of a high-low satellite- to-satellite tracking mission. Data from the CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload (champ) mission collected in the period April 2002 to February 2004 has been used to recover the gravity field to degree and order 70 on a monthly basis. The quality is primarily restricted by the accuracy of the instruments. Besides, champ passed through a 31/2 repeat mode three times during the period of interest resulting in an insufficient spatial sampling and a degraded solution. Contrary to the rule of thumb by Colombo (The global mapping of gravity with two satellites, Publications on Geodesy, vol 7(3), Netherlands Geodetic Commission, The Netherlands, 263 pp, 1984), see also Wagner (J Geod 80(2): 94-103, 2006), we found that the monthly solutions themselves could be recovered to about degree 30, not 15. In order to improve the monthly gravity solutions, two strategies have been developed: the restriction to a low degree, and the densification of the sampling by the introduction of additional sensitive measurements from contemporaneous satellite missions. The latter method is tested by combining the champ measurements with data from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (grace). Note that the two grace satellites are considered independent here, i.e. no use is made of the K-band ranging data. This way, we are able to almost entirely remove the influence of the ground track leaving the accuracy of the instruments as the primary restriction on the quality of a monthly solution. These findings are especially interesting for the upcoming swarm-mission since it will consist of a similar configuration as the combined champ and (grace) missions.
Organisation(s): Institute of Geodesy
External Organisation(s): University of Stuttgart
University of Calgary
Type: Article
Journal: Journal of geodesy
Volume: 83
Pages: 1131-1143
No. of pages: 13
ISSN: 0949-7714
Publication date: 12.2009
Publication status: Published
Peer reviewed: Yes
ASJC Scopus subject areas: Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology, Computers in Earth Sciences
Electronic version(s): https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0330-5 (Access: Unknown)
: Details in the research portal "Research@Leibniz University"

BibTeX

@article{99e2133bb9d7427e8ae8c1d8c072317e,
title = "On the influence of the ground track on the gravity field recovery from high-low satellite-to-satellite tracking missions: CHAMP monthly gravity field recovery using the energy balance approach revisited",
abstract = "In this paper, the influence of the ground track coverage on the quality of a monthly gravity field solution is investigated for the scenario of a high-low satellite- to-satellite tracking mission. Data from the CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload (champ) mission collected in the period April 2002 to February 2004 has been used to recover the gravity field to degree and order 70 on a monthly basis. The quality is primarily restricted by the accuracy of the instruments. Besides, champ passed through a 31/2 repeat mode three times during the period of interest resulting in an insufficient spatial sampling and a degraded solution. Contrary to the rule of thumb by Colombo (The global mapping of gravity with two satellites, Publications on Geodesy, vol 7(3), Netherlands Geodetic Commission, The Netherlands, 263 pp, 1984), see also Wagner (J Geod 80(2): 94-103, 2006), we found that the monthly solutions themselves could be recovered to about degree 30, not 15. In order to improve the monthly gravity solutions, two strategies have been developed: the restriction to a low degree, and the densification of the sampling by the introduction of additional sensitive measurements from contemporaneous satellite missions. The latter method is tested by combining the champ measurements with data from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (grace). Note that the two grace satellites are considered independent here, i.e. no use is made of the K-band ranging data. This way, we are able to almost entirely remove the influence of the ground track leaving the accuracy of the instruments as the primary restriction on the quality of a monthly solution. These findings are especially interesting for the upcoming swarm-mission since it will consist of a similar configuration as the combined champ and (grace) missions.",
keywords = "Aliasing, Champ, Energy balance approach, Orthogonality, Variance component estimation",
author = "Matthias Weigelt and Sideris, {Michael G.} and Nico Sneeuw",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s00190-009-0330-5",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "1131--1143",
journal = "Journal of geodesy",
issn = "0949-7714",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "12",
}